Tamara Schad

Abstract

Abstract Liquid foams of intermediate stability have been shown to be very efficient in the cleaning of sensitive surfaces because of the synergy between imbibition and foam decay. While we quantified these mechanisms for contaminations with liquid oils in our previous work, we show here their extension to oils containing soot particles in an effort to simulate increasingly realistic contaminations. Using foams with a wide range of liquid fractions and with different stabilities, we show that the main cleaning mechanisms remain very similar, with the oil entraining the soot particles. However, we find much less efficient soot removal when the liquid channels of the foams are small enough to hinder efficient transport of the soot particles.

Abstract

Hypothesis Foamed surfactant solutions can clean surfaces! We hypothesise that the cleaning efficiency depends on the liquid fraction and on the stability of the foam. We also hypothesise that the cleaning efficiency is the better the smaller the average bubble size is. Experiments The double syringe technique was used to generate foams with varying liquid fractions but the same, very small bubble sizes with and without perfluorohexane in the gas phase. We performed cleaning tests in which the foams were applied to glass substrates contaminated with a fluorescent oil. Findings We found that unstable foams clean better than stable foams. Three cleaning mechanisms were identified: (1) imbibition at low liquid fractions, (2) wiping, i.e., shifting of the contact line between oil, foam and glass, at all liquid fractions, and (3) drainage at high liquid fractions. The change of the liquid fraction and of the foam stability lead to different combinations of these mechanisms and thus to different cleaning results.

Abstract

On the basis of previous results revealing that intersurfactant H-bonds improve foam stability, we now focus on how foams stabilized by two different N-acyl amino acid surfactants are affected by different salts (NaF, NaCl, NaSCN), which can promote or break intersurfactant H-bonds. The chosen surfactants, namely, sodium N-lauroyl sarcosinate (C12SarcNa) and sodium N-lauroyl glycinate (C12GlyNa), differ only by one methyl group at the nitrogen of the amide bond that blocks intersurfactant H-bonds in the case of C12SarcNa. The salts were chosen because they are kosmotropic (NaF), chaotropic (NaSCN), and in between (NaCl) and thus influence the formation of an H-bond network in different ways. Surface tension measurements showed that the addition of salts decreased the cmcs of both surfactants and increased the packing density, as expected. Moreover, in presence of the salts, the head groups of the H-bond forming surfactant C12GlyNa were more tightly packed at the surface than the C12SarcNa head groups. The effect of the salts on foam stability was studied by analysis of the foam height, the foam liquid fraction, and by image analysis of the foam structure. As expected, the salts had no significant effect on foams stabilized by C12SarcNa, which is unable to form intersurfactant H-bonds. In contrast, the stability of C12GlyNa-containing foams followed the trend NaF > NaCl > NaSCN, which is in agreement with NaF promoting and NaSCN breaking intersurfactant H-bonds. Surface rheology measurements allowed us to correlate foam stability with surface elasticity. This study provides new insights into the importance of H-bond promoters and breakers, which should be used in the future design of tailor-made surfactants.